MYTH & MIRROR

Our Mission

Myth & Mirror exists to make shadow work and depth psychology accessible, understandable, and actionable. We are committed to providing accurate, comprehensive, and genuinely helpful educational content based on established psychological frameworks and personal practice experience.

Content Creation Standards

Research & Fact-Checking

Every article on Myth & Mirror undergoes a rigorous research and review process:

• Source Material: Content is based on established psychological frameworks including Jungian psychology, Internal Family Systems (IFS), attachment theory, somatic psychology, and trauma-informed approaches.
• Primary Sources: We reference original works by Carl Jung, Robert Johnson, Connie Zweig, Richard Schwartz, Bessel van der Kolk, and other recognized authorities in depth psychology.
• Clinical Context: Psychological concepts are presented with appropriate clinical context and disclaimers about limitations.
• Verification: All claims about psychological concepts are verified against multiple authoritative sources.
• Updates: Content is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect current understanding and research. Last updated dates appear on all articles.

Expertise & Experience

Content is created by practitioners with:

• Over 10 years of depth psychology study
• Extensive personal shadow work practice
• Training in Jungian psychology, IFS, and somatic approaches
• Ongoing engagement with professional literature and therapeutic communities

Content Types & Purposes

We create several types of content, each serving a specific educational purpose:

• Foundational Guides: Comprehensive articles explaining core concepts (What is Shadow Work, Jung's Shadow, etc.)
• Practical Tutorials: Step-by-step instructions for shadow work practices (journaling, meditation, trigger tracking)
• Archetype Profiles: Detailed explorations of shadow archetypes and patterns
• Application Articles: Shadow work applied to specific areas (relationships, trauma, empaths)
• Resource Guides: Curated recommendations for books, therapists, and tools

Editorial Process

Content Development

1. Topic Research: Identify user needs and knowledge gaps through search data and community questions
2. Outline Development: Create comprehensive outlines based on authoritative sources
3. Drafting: Write detailed content integrating theory, practice, and examples
4. Source Verification: Cross-check all psychological claims against primary sources
5. Practical Testing: Ensure exercises and techniques are clearly explained and safe to practice
6. Review & Revision: Multiple rounds of editing for clarity, accuracy, and completeness
7. Final Quality Check: Verify all links, schema markup, metadata, and formatting

Ongoing Maintenance

• Regular Reviews: Articles are reviewed quarterly for accuracy and relevance
• User Feedback: Reader questions and feedback inform content improvements
• Current Research: New developments in depth psychology are incorporated into relevant articles
• Link Maintenance: External resources and references are checked for continued availability
• Update Transparency: All articles display "Last updated" dates to show content currency

Ethical Guidelines

Safety First

We prioritize reader safety in all content:

• Clear warnings about when shadow work may not be appropriate
• Guidance on recognizing when to seek professional support
• Emphasis on self-compassion and gradual pacing
• Warnings about potential emotional intensity
• Information about crisis resources when relevant

Transparency & Honesty

• Limitations: We are transparent about what we can and cannot help with
• Credentials: Clear about our background and qualifications (study and practice, not clinical licensure)
• Disclaimers: Every article includes appropriate disclaimers about not replacing professional care
• Conflicts of Interest: We disclose any potential conflicts (currently none - we are an independent educational resource)
• Affiliate Relationships: Any affiliate links or sponsored content is clearly disclosed (currently we have none)

Respect for Readers

• No fear-mongering or manipulation
• No false promises or guaranteed outcomes
• No pressure to purchase products or services
• Honest about the challenges and timeframes of shadow work
• Respectful of different approaches and perspectives

Sources & References

Primary Theoretical Sources

Our content draws from these foundational works and frameworks:

• Carl Jung: Collected Works, "Psychology and Alchemy," "Aion," "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology"
• Robert A. Johnson: "Owning Your Own Shadow," "Inner Work"
• Connie Zweig & Jeremiah Abrams: "Meeting the Shadow," "Romancing the Shadow"
• Richard Schwartz: Internal Family Systems model and therapeutic framework
• Bessel van der Kolk: "The Body Keeps the Score" (trauma and somatic integration)
• James Hollis: "The Middle Passage," "Swamplands of the Soul"
• Marie-Louise von Franz: "Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales"

Contemporary Clinical Frameworks

• Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy
• Somatic Experiencing (SE)
• Attachment theory and research
• Trauma-informed approaches
• Gestalt therapy techniques
• Psychodynamic psychology

Content Quality Metrics

We maintain high standards across all content:

• Minimum Length: All articles are 1,500+ words (average 2,178 words)
• Reading Time: Average 11 minutes per article, indicating substantial depth
• Comprehensiveness: Major topics covered with 5,000+ word comprehensive guides
• Practical Value: All articles include actionable practices, exercises, or applications
• Original Content: 100% original writing, no scraped or duplicated content
• Regular Updates: Content reviewed and updated to maintain accuracy

Medical & Mental Health Disclaimers

User Feedback & Corrections

We value reader feedback and are committed to continuous improvement:

• Corrections: If you notice factual errors, please contact us at hello@mythandmirror.com
• Suggestions: We welcome suggestions for new topics or article improvements
• Questions: Reader questions help us identify areas needing clarification
• Response Time: We typically respond to emails within 48 hours

Contact us with feedback →

Privacy & Data Protection

We respect reader privacy and handle data responsibly:

• No personal data collection beyond standard web analytics
• No email list or newsletter (we don't collect email addresses)
• Standard cookies for site functionality and analytics only
• No selling or sharing of user data

Read our full Privacy Policy →

Editorial Independence

Myth & Mirror maintains complete editorial independence:

• No Corporate Sponsorship: We are not affiliated with any therapy practice, training program, or commercial entity
• No Paid Placements: Book recommendations and resource lists are based solely on educational value, not compensation
• No Affiliate Relationships: Currently we have no affiliate partnerships or commercial arrangements
• Independent Operation: Content decisions are made based on educational value and user needs, not commercial considerations